1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 439 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5621 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 346 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 91 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2579 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 129 L |
