1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Jaguar XKR
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XKR is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XKR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XKR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Jaguar XKR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XKR |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |