1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2006 Honda Civic. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Civic.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Civic. (167 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Honda Civic | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Civic |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1339 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 167 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 73 L |