1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2006 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | 62 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
