1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2006 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki SX4. (184 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki SX4.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | 62 | SX4 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |