1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford E-350
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 2008 Ford E-350.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |