1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 386 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jaguar XJ. (420 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJ |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 420 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 85 L |