1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 272 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Commander |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2412 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 78 L |