1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | LR2 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 317 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |