1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | Rustler |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 54 L |