1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Opel Astra
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 910 kg more than 2008 Opel Astra.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Opel Astra | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | 62 | Astra |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1589 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 52 L |