1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2009 Mercury Mariner is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mariner (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2009 Mercury Mariner.

Because 2009 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Mariner. (302 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Cadillac 62 2009 Mercury Mariner
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model 62 Mariner
Year Released 1961 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 2967 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6550 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 302 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 62 L