1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 250 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |