1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (207 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mercedes-Benz G. (540 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mercedes-Benz G.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | G |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 540 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4686 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 96 L |