1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2011 Seat Exeo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2011 Seat Exeo. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2011 Seat Exeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | 62 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2642 mm |