1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Ford F-450
To start off, 2012 Ford F-450 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 2012 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-450 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2438 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2024 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 4379 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 142 L |