1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 241 kg more than 2012 Jaguar XJ.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jaguar XJ. (515 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jaguar XJ.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Cadillac 62 2012 Jaguar XJ
Make Cadillac Jaguar
Model 62 XJ
Year Released 1961 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 385 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 515 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1874 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 5252 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1895 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 3157 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 82 L