1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 637 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | 62 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |
