1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 164 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |