1961 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1984 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1984 Seat Ronda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1984 Seat Ronda.
Because 1961 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac DeVille | 1984 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | DeVille | Ronda |
Year Released | 1961 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |