1961 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1092 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Because 1961 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |
