1961 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Doblo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Doblo. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1961 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Fiat Doblo. (180 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | DeVille | Doblo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2755 mm |