1961 Cadillac Park Avenue vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Park Avenue | 3 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |
