1961 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1969 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1969 Mazda 1000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1455 kg more than 1969 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac Sixty | 1969 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | 1000 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 77 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2270 mm |