1961 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 242 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (334 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | Sixty | Axiom |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |