1961 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | Sixty | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
