1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1961 Chevrolet Corvair.
Because 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Corvair | 626 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2687 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |