1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 380 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Corvair | Smart |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2368 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 35 L |
