1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2003 Hyundai Dynasty
To start off, 2003 Hyundai Dynasty is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Hyundai Dynasty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Hyundai Dynasty weights approximately 580 kg more than 1961 Chevrolet Corvair.
Because 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Hyundai Dynasty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 2003 Hyundai Dynasty | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hyundai |
Model | Corvair | Dynasty |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2687 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |