1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2004 Proton 300
To start off, 2004 Proton 300 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 135 kg more than 2004 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 2004 Proton 300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
Model | Corvair | 300 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2368 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |