1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1961 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Corvair | 3 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2368 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |