1961 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 4,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 953 kg more than 1961 Chevrolet Corvair.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chevrolet Corvair | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Corvair | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2687 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2053 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2789 mm |