1961 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1961 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Chrysler Imperial. (510 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Chrysler Imperial | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | Mustang |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 556 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2580 mm |