1961 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 667 kg more than 1961 Chrysler New Yorker.

Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Chrysler New Yorker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Chrysler New Yorker 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Chrysler Land Rover
Model New Yorker Range Rover
Year Released 1961 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 305 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1890 kg 2557 kg
Vehicle Length 5620 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2200 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2750 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]