1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 240 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1961 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: