1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 1997 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 MCC Smart weights approximately 155 kg more than 1961 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Citroen 2CV | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | 2CV | Smart |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
