1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1961 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | 2CV | Ram |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 76 L |
