1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1961 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda Marathon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Marathon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | Marathon |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 2260 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1517 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 76 L |
