1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Citroen 2CV | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | boxer | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |
