1961 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 624 cc (2 cylinders), 2011 Tata Nano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Tata Nano (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Tata Nano should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Tata Nano weights approximately 105 kg more than 1961 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Tata Nano (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Tata Nano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | 2CV | Nano |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 37 L |
