1961 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1961 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 415 kg more than 1961 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (145 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Citroen Ami. (43 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Citroen Ami | 2000 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
Model | Ami | Lanos |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 43 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 48 L |