1961 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1961 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1961 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 616 kg more than 1961 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Citroen DS | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | DS | XF |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1771 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 69 L |