1961 DAF 600 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1980 Toyota Cressida is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Cressida (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1961 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 630 kg more than 1961 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Cressida (132 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Cressida will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DAF 600 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1961 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 132 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |