1961 DAF 600 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1961 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 846 kg more than 1961 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DAF 600 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |