1961 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1961 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1961 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF 600 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2486 cc |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 64 L |
