1961 DAF 600 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1961 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 848 kg more than 1961 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1961 DAF 600 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 226 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 70 L |