1961 DAF 600 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1961 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1118 kg more than 1961 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF 600 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | DAF | Cadillac |
| Model | 600 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |
