1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Triumph 2000 (90 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF Daffodil | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | DAF | Triumph |
| Model | Daffodil | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
