1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 815 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4603 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |
