1961 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2000 Pagani Zonda is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pagani Zonda (389 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 585 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | DAF | Pagani |
| Model | Daffodil | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2055 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
